Steve August 15, 2020
is-kamala-harris-a-hawk?

Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin hasn’t forgotten a 2017 meeting with members
of Senator Kamala Harris’s staff to discuss the
humanitarian crisis
in Gaza. The Israeli land and sea blockade was
causing massive unemployment as well as shortages of food and electricity. Benjamin
and other progressive activists wanted the Senator to criticize Israel’s policies
and end the siege.

“You could just see the blank stares from her aides as we spoke,”
Benjamin recalls in a phone interview from Washington, D.C. “They argued
that Israel has the right to defend itself. There was no sympathy for the Palestinians.”

This week, activists are recirculating a photo
of a smiling Kamala Harris standing next to ultra-rightwing Israeli Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu in November 2017.

“She’s proud of her ties with Netanyahu and [the] Israeli government,”
Benjamin says.

This week, Joe Biden picked the California Senator as his vice presidential
running mate. Just as her history as a law-and-order prosecutor is now getting
closer scrutiny, so should her foreign policy views.

Harris closely adheres to Democratic Party mainstream policies, which under
President Barack Obama brought us wars in Syria, Libya, and Yemen, as well as
escalated wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

“She has views close to the Obama Administration, nothing that would be
an exciting departure from US militarism,” says Benjamin, a contributor
to The Progressive. “They are certainly different from Bernie Sanders’s.”

Trump criticized

Harris, like most Democrats, has often been at odds with Trump’s foreign policy.

“The current President,” she
wrote
in a 2019 candidate questionnaire to the Council on Foreign
Relations, “seems intent on inflicting further damage to US credibility
by disregarding diplomacy, withdrawing from international agreements and institutions,
shunning our allies, siding with dictatorships over democracies, and elevating
sheer incompetence in his decision-making processes.”

But instead of offering a progressive alternative, Harris often attacks Trump
from the right, criticizing him for cozying up to leaders in North Korea, Russia,
and China. For example, she
supports sanctions
against Russia for meddling in Ukraine and annexing
Crimea.

Marco Carnelos, a former Italian ambassador to Iraq, tells me from Rome, “I
understand that Russia may be sanctioned over Crimea. Are we sure that the same
zeal will be applied to Israel if it should annex the West Bank?”

Carnelos also highlighted Washington’s recent outpouring of sympathy for Uighurs,
a Muslim minority in China. “I’ve never seen such concern for this specific
Muslim population from the US,” he says. “A few years ago, no one
cared. Now that the US is in conflict with China, it’s a little bit suspect.”

Carnelos believes that the US uses human rights and national security issues
to protect US business profits from Chinese competition. He notes the ramped-up
attacks on Beijing coincide with fierce competition from companies like phone
manufacturer Huawei.

“It is absurd that after thirty years,” he says, “the US discovered
China is ruled by a Communist Party!”

No plan to end wars

Harris denounces Trump’s “endless wars” but offers no specific plans
to end them. During her presidential primary campaign, she
failed
to commit to withdrawing all US troops from Afghanistan, even
by the end of a first term in 2024.

On Iran, she told the Council on Foreign Relations, the US must rejoin the
nuclear accord “so long as Iran also returned to verifiable compliance.”
She would also seek changes
in the agreement to “supplement some of the nuclear deal’s existing provisions,
and work with our partners to counter Iran’s destabilizing behavior in the region,
including with regard to its ballistic missile program.”

Neither Harris nor Biden have specified
whether they would immediately lift US sanctions once Iran returns to the agreement,
from which the Trump Administration unilaterally
withdrew
in 2018.

Harris has taken some progressive stances. She co-sponsored
bills in 2018 and 2019 with Bernie Sanders calling for an end to US support
for the war in Yemen. She criticized
the regime in Saudi Arabia for waging that war and for its human rights violations,
including the murder of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

“The US and Saudi Arabia still have mutual areas of interest, such as
counterterrorism, where the Saudis have been strong partners,” Harris has
said. “But
we need to fundamentally reevaluate our relationship with Saudi Arabia, using
our leverage to stand up for American values and interests.”

Tom Gallagher, a former member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives
and once a progressive challenger to Representative Nancy Pelosi, acknowledges
that “Harris is no gem on the Middle East.” But, he adds, “a
future Biden Administration won’t be as ridiculously one-sided as Trump.”

Harris opposes the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific
Partnership, commonly known as the CPTPP. She calls for an end to Trump’s “tariff
wars” and supports “pro-labor, pro-environment trade deals.”

“That’s a plus,” says Gallagher. “On trade matters, the Democrats
have gotten the message. Labor and environmentalists have impacted the mainline
leaders.”

Hope for the future?

The activists I interviewed think Harris is a better choice than über-hawk
Susan Rice, who was also in the running. Rice
pushed
for the disastrous Libyan war and praised
the air wars in Somalia and Yemen.. They also note that Harris has at times
engaged in dialogue with progressives.

“Even though I disagreed with her politics,” says Code Pink’s Benjamin,
“I found her accessible and charming. At demonstrations, she would sometimes
come out to chat with us.”

Friendly chats won’t be enough, however, to change the foreign policy of a
future Biden Administration.

“There’s already been a lot of pressure on Biden,” as progressives
fight over the Democratic Party platform, Benjamin says. “We’ve seen a
coming together of groups who don’t normally work together.”

In the past, she notes, some liberal and progressive groups were reluctant
to criticize the Obama Administration’s militarism. “I don’t think people
will make that mistake again.”

Reese Erlich’s nationally distributed column, Foreign Correspondent, appears
twice monthly. His book

The Iran Agenda Today
: The Real Story from Inside Iran and What’s Wrong
with US Policy – is now available. Follow him on
Twitter
, @ReeseErlich; friend him on
Facebook
; and visit his
webpage
.

Read More