The tenure of the Steve Bannon ally who President Tweety McTreason appointed to run the vast global network of news agencies operated by the US government is going about as well you’d expect. That is to say: not well at all, if you ask top reporters at one of the most prestigious outlets he now manages.
On Monday, 14 reporters at Voice of America sent a letter to their acting editor to sharply rebuke Michael Pack, the CEO of the US Agency for Global Media, for his controversial campaign to — as he put it last week — “drain the swamp.”
“We fear that the current USAGM leadership is failing not only the news organizations … and our audiences, but also our stakeholders, including the American public,” reads the letter, signed by VOA Washington editor Aru Pande, White House bureau chief Steve Herman, Islamabad bureau chief Ayesha Tanzeem, and others. “Michael Pack’s actions risk crippling programs and projects for some countries that are considered national security priorities.”
Pack has made a series of eyebrow-raising moves that have many suspecting he aims to turn the taxpayer-funded USAGM into a pro-Trump shop.
USAGM, which oversees VOA, Middle East Broadcasting, Radio Free Asia, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, and the Office of Cuba Broadcasting, had its problems before Pack arrived. For instance, many stories run by those organizations have a pro-US bent, leading some to say they remain in the propaganda business, as opposed to the objective reporting business, like they were during World War II and the Cold War.
But Pack’s moves to reshape the agency have experts — and now his own reporters — worried. Among other things, he replaced the editors of four outlets at the agency within hours of becoming the Senate-confirmed CEO in June and fired senior officials for pointing out possible violations of the “firewall” that protects USAGM reporters from political interference.
Listen to Pack describe what he’s up to, and he defends taking action to rid the government agency of an alleged left-wing bent, deep-state plants, and foreign spies — even though he has provided no clear evidence for the presence of any of those.
“My job really is to drain the swamp, to root out corruption, and to deal with these issues of bias,” he said on The Federalist Radio Hour podcast last week, joking with the host that he’d “look into” doing so by turning off the air conditioning or banning masks. However, he did say it was not his goal “to tell journalists what to report” and that he’s not purging employees.
Later in the interview, Pack said, “Foreign intelligence agencies from the beginning of the creation of these agencies have been interested in penetrating them. To be a journalist is a great cover for a spy,” though he said he’s unaware of any staffer with ties to foreign intelligence, blaming that lack of knowledge on poor security screenings at the agency.
Such statements led to Monday’s letter from VOA reporters.
“Many of us have repeatedly put ourselves in harm’s way abroad for our audiences of several hundred million people in nearly 50 languages,” the signatories wrote, and therefore “insist on competent and professional oversight” from their leaders in accordance with federal law.
The letter, obtained by Vox and others, puts a months-long internal fight for the future of US broadcasting out into the open.
Why the USAGM fight matters
What’s happening at USAGM isn’t just a disagreement about how one government agency operates, but also about how America represents itself to the world and the model it sets for other nations.
As I’ve previously written, these outlets were created “to disseminate factual, unbiased news to people who live in countries where freedom of the press is either strongly curtailed or nonexistent.”
Though the news agencies are funded and overseen by the federal government, they operate independently when it comes to all editorial decisions like what stories to cover and how to cover them.
That “firewall,” enshrined in US law, “prohibits interference by any US government official in the objective, independent reporting of news, thereby safeguarding the ability of our journalists to develop content that reflects the highest professional standards of journalism, free of political interference,” according to the VOA website.
This serves a critical purpose in US diplomacy abroad: Showcasing America’s ability to report independently, without direct government interference in the editorial process, displays the US as a free society where freedom of the press is not only protected but valued.
Pack, who is aware his actions have ruffled feathers inside and outside the organization, must now contend with the public discontent of his own employees. It’s unlikely he’ll fire all 14 staffers, though, as such a move would receive strong pushback from Congress and potentially flout political interference protection laws.
USAGM didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the letter.
Pack has a point when he says his agency has problems, many of which have been previously highlighted by Democrats such as Hillary Clinton. A recent controversy last month included a video made by Voice of America’s Urdu service which many (including Pack) said looked more like a pro-Biden political ad than a news piece, leading the CEO to remove multiple contractors and editors involved with the production.
None of that justifies the blunt remedies Pack is proposing, experts say, namely his insistence of security problems at US-funded news outlets.
“Pack’s insistence that there were issues related to security in hiring at VOA is merely a smokescreen to avert attention from his blatant attempt to interfere with the legislatively mandated independence, or firewall, protecting the journalists of VOA from government interference,” former USAGM CEO John Lansing told NPR — the outlet he now leads — on Monday.
The question now is if the open revolt will cause Pack to change his ways. Based on his actions and comments so far, though, that seems unlikely — which means an intra-USAGM fight is likely to continue spilling out into the open for weeks to come.
Help keep Vox free for all
Millions turn to Vox each month to understand what’s happening in the news, from the coronavirus crisis to a racial reckoning to what is, quite possibly, the most consequential presidential election of our lifetimes. Our mission has never been more vital than it is in this moment: to empower you through understanding. But our distinctive brand of explanatory journalism takes resources — particularly during a pandemic and an economic downturn. Even when the economy and the news advertising market recovers, your support will be a critical part of sustaining our resource-intensive work, and helping everyone make sense of an increasingly chaotic world. Contribute today from as little as $3.